Who Do Polls Really Influence Survey Institutions and Mediatized Political Communication in Indonesia
Keywords:
political communication, mediatization, public opinion, survey institutions, sustainable democracyAbstract
This research explores the response of Indonesian national poll organizations to the mediatization of public opinion polls within evolving political communication. Using a qualitative with phenomenological approach, interviews with senior researchers from four leading polling institutions consider how media interactions and the communication of survey results influence professional practices. The results find that polling organizations have a high degree of interdependence with news media. Pollsters adapt to media logic: they distill survey results into concise, news-friendly formats, while news organisations use polling data as reliable political information and for drawing public attention. Fear of misuse or manipulation of data may cause pollsters to withhold disclosure. And political elites respond more strongly to media exposure of polls than local-level voters, with survey results influencing party agendas and strategies rather than directly shaping voter preferences. In this regard, mediatization is a tool which can either bolster or erode democratic processes. News coverage of politicians in the media can amplify public discourse, but sensationalist coverage risks eroding public trust. The study stresses how better ethical norms need to be defined and that media literacy should be intensified, such that public opinion polls can contribute to ensuring sustainable democracy in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Abu-Ayyash, S. (2024). Mediatized politics in Palestine: Online platforms’ influence on framing of politicians’ messages. Communication and the Public, 9(1), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/20570473231224820
Ahmad, N. (2018). Mediatisation of Politics as An Emanating Research Paradigm: Assessment and Reflection on the Weaknesses and Potential Contributions of Strömbäck” (2008) Theory of Mediatisation of Politics. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 6(2), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.7454/jki.v6i2.8913
Badman, R. P., Wang, A. X., Skrodzki, M., & Cho, H-C., et al. (2022). Trust in institutions, not in political leaders, determines compliance in COVID-19 prevention measures across the globe. Behavioral Sciences, 12(6), 170. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12060170
Badman, R. P., Wang, A. X., Skrodzki, M., Aini, A., Akaishi, R., et al. (2022). Trust in institutions, not in political leaders, determines COVID-19 public health compliance across societies worldwide. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 16724. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20807-x
Berk, N. (2025). The Impact of Media Framing in Complex Information Environments. Political Communication, 42(5), 757–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2025.2456519
Bethäuser, J., Menold, N., & Winker, P. (2025). How survey results are reported in the media: A framework on selection mechanisms and a pilot study on reporting practice. PLOS One, 20(10), e0333066. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333066
Burchett, H. E., Kneale, D., Blanchard, L., & Thomas, J. (2020). When assessing generalisability, focusing on differences in population or setting alone is insufficient. Trials, 21(1), 286.
Cilesiz, S. (2011). A phenomenological approach to experiences with technology: Current state, promise, and future directions. Educational Technology Research & Development, 59(4), 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9173-2
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Couper, M. P. (2000) Web Surveys: A Review of Issues and Approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly (64) 464-494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/318641
Daherman, Y., & Taufiq, I. (2023). Positive Trend Correlation of Jokowi’s Social Media Exposure Regarding Electability of #probowopresiden2024.
D’Angelo, P., Büchel, F., & Esser, F. (2014). Mediatization of Campaign Coverage: Metacoverage of US Elections. Dalam F. Esser & J. Strömbäck (Ed.), Mediatization of Politics (hlm. 156–180). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137275844_9.
Dillman, D. A. (2016). Internet, Phone, Mail and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method.
Elfandari, S. (2024). Influence of Political Advertising Effectiveness on the Perspectives of Young Voters in the 2024 Indonesian Election. Ultimacomm: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 15(2), 300–315. https://doi.org/10.31937/ultimacomm.v15i2.3543
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. McQuail's reader in mass communication theory, 390, 397.
Finnemann, N. O. (2011). Mediatization theory and digital media. Communications, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2011.004
Firdaus, A., Aksar, I. A., Gong, J., Zaiamri Zainal Abidin, M., ur Rasheed Baloch, H., & Gomez, E. (2025). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) for Journalism Studies: Making Sense of Journalists’ Sense-Making of Digital Disruptions. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24, 16094069241309274.
Fletcher, R., Andı, S., Badrinathan, S., Eddy, K. A., Kalogeropoulos, A., Mont’Alverne, C., Robertson, C. T., Ross Arguedas, A., Schulz, A., Toff, B., & Nielsen, R. K. (2025). The link between changing news use and trust: Longitudinal analysis of 46 countries. Journal of Communication, 75(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqae044
Gasuku, G. (2023). Polling and voter motivation: The dual effects of opinion surveys on electoral engagement. African Journal of Political Science, 28(1), 112–130.
Ghanjali, A. N. S. (2024). The Audience Reception and AI in the Political Campaign of the 2024 Bali District Heads Election. Ultimacomm: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 16(2), 324-345.
Gianan, E. R. D. Q. (2020). Disinformation trends in Southeast Asia: comparative case studies on Indonesia, Myanmar, and the Philippines. Jati-Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 25(1), 1-27.
Gulzar, S., Hai, Z., & Paudel, B. K. (2021). Information, candidate selection, and the quality of representation: Evidence from Nepal. The Journal of Politics, 83(4), 1511-1528.
Heriyawan, I., et al. (2024). Understanding the Dynamics of Political Communication Participation of Chinese Ethnic Groups in Jakarta: A Phenomenological Study. INTERDISIPLIN: Journal of Qualitative and Quantitative Research, 1(6), 400–417.
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
Lloyd, N., Hyett, N., & Kenny, A. (2024). To member check or not to member check? An evaluation of member checking in an interpretive descriptive study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 16094069241301383.
Masduki, M. (2022). Public service broadcasting model in Indonesian transitional democracy. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 10(1), 1-13.
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public opinion quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.
Morgan, H. (2024). Using triangulation and crystallization to make qualitative studies trustworthy and rigorous. The Qualitative Report, 29(7), 1844-1856.
Neuner, F., Soroka, S., & Wlezien, C. (2019). Mass media as a source of public responsiveness. International Journal of Press/Politics, 24(3), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219836215
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods 3rd. ed. Sage publications.
Reid, K., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2005). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: An overview and methodological review. The Psychologist, 18(1), 20-23.
Scarano, S., Vasudevan, V., Samory, M., Yang, K. C., Yang, J., & Grabowicz, P. A. (2025, June). Election Polls on Social Media: Prevalence, Biases, and Voter Fraud Beliefs. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (Vol. 19, pp. 1771-1785).
Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of communication, 49(1), 103-122.
Strömbäck, J., & Esser, F. (2014). Mediatization of politics: Transforming democracies and reshaping politics. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization of communication (pp. 375–403). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Strömbäck, J., & Esser, F. (2017). Political Public Relations and Mediatization: The Strategies of News Management. Dalam P. Van Aelst & S. Walgrave (Ed.), How Political Actors Use the Media (hlm. 63–83). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60249-3_4
Valero Sancho, J., & Castañeda Zumeta, A. (2018). Nuevas narrativas visuales / Novas narrativas visuais (73rd edn). Revista Latina de Comunicación Social. https://doi.org/10.4185/cac150
Venus, A., Intyaswati, D., Ayuningtyas, F., & Lestari, P. (2025). Political participation in the digital age: Impact of influencers and advertising on Generation Z. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 12(1), 2520063.
Wake, A., Ambrose, D., & Grenfell, D. (2024). Fact-Checking and Verification: The Changing Role of Professional Journalists. In Transnational Broadcasting in the Indo Pacific: The Battle for Trusted News and Information (pp. 159-176). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Widodo, S., & Kristiyono, J. (2025). Digital democracy: transforming political communication in Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 9(1), 153-168.
Wijayanto, B. S., Martini, R., & Elsitra, G. N. (2022, September). Digital authoritarianism in Southeast Asia: a systematic literature review. In ICISPE 2021: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Social and Political Enquiries, ICISPE 2021, 14-15 September 2021, Semarang, Indonesia (p. 465). European Alliance for Innovation.
Wlezien, C. (2017). Public opinion and policy representation: On conceptualization, measurement, and interpretation. Policy Studies Journal, 45(4), 561–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12191
Zollmann, F. (2012). Manufacturing provincialism: How the media narrows public discourse. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Verdy Firmantoro, Syahirul Alim, Nisa Alfira, Fidzia Alima
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Ultimacomm Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to its articles' full texts and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
1. Authors are allowed to archive their submitted article in an open access repository
2. Authors are allowed to archive the final published article in an open access repository with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal
